The intent of the initiative petition that is sponsored by the Idaho Wildlife Federation would, if it became law, amend title 36-102 that governs the Idaho Fish and Game Commission. In my opinion, this initiative was prompted by individuals who feel the farmers and ranchers of Idaho have too much control of our Legislature. Farmers and ranchers do have a place at the table. The farmers and ranchers have done more for our wildlife in this state than Fish and Game has or will ever do.

They have to continually repair broken-down fences, endure crop damage, provide forage and contend with a few sportsmen who trespass and destroy their private property. If the initiative becomes law at the ballot box, we will lose two commissioners in eastern Idaho; regions V and VI would be combined.

This initiative is designed to empower only a small minority of sportsmen of Idaho. Rural Idaho will have very little, if any, input in the decision process.If the Legislature is not part of the process, we as sportsmen and sportswomen have lost our elected voice.

In the past, the Legislature has corrected and prevented some major problems with Fish and Game. This initiative is so poorly written, it doesn't state anywhere one word about who sets the budget for Fish and Game. I suggest the supporters of this initiative check with the sportsmen's groups that they have listed as supporters. The Southeastern Idaho Rod & Gun Club that they have listed disbanded more than three years ago.

At least the majority, if not all Western states, involve their Legislatures with the management of their wildlife. I totally agree with the new Director Steve Huffaker when he stated politics are a part of wildlife management today. The way wildlife affects the lives and livelihood of all the citizens, it would be a bit na"ve to think that you don't have a political process when you have wildlife issues that affect everyone.

Eldridge is a sportsman from St. Anthony, Idaho.

Reprinted from The Idaho Post Register.